| |
|
By
SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and ROBERT PEAR
WASHINGTON, March
17 -- Late one Friday
afternoon in January, after the House of Representatives had
adjourned for the week, Cybele Bjorklund, a House Democratic
health policy aide, heard the buzz of the fax machine at her
desk. Coming over the transom, with no hint of the sender, was
a document she had been seeking for months: an estimate by Medicare's
chief actuary showing the cost of prescription drug benefits
for the elderly. Dated June 11,
2003, the document put the cost at $551.5 billion over 10 years.
It appeared to confirm what Ms. Bjorklund and her bosses on the
House Ways and Means Committee had long suspected: the actuary,
Richard S. Foster, had concluded the legislation would be far
more expensive than Congress's $400 billion estimate -- and
had kept quiet while lawmakers voted on the bill and President
Bush signed it into law. Read
More
|
|
|
|