States and Employers Duel Over Health Care
 
Current News and Headlines
(Updated 06/08/2005 )
    "CAFTA outlook clouded by NAFTA's failure for farmers"  
    "GM Plans to Cut 25,000 Jobs"      
   

"Medical errors still claiming many lives"

 
  Archive  
    View Previous "Jobs" Articles  
    View Previous "Healthcare" Articles  
    View Previous "Fair Trade " Articles  
  Latest Media  
    AEJ Press Release  
AEJ Iowa Ad
Windows Media Player
    AEJ HealthCare Ad  
               
 

By REED ABELSON

The relentless rise in health care costs is causing states and businesses to fight over whose job it is to insure workers. And nearly two dozen states, struggling with the growing burden of providing public assistance to people with jobs but no insurance, are looking to shift more of the financial burden onto the workers' employers.

Last month, for example, Maryland, which spends roughly $350 million a year on health care for the uninsured, passed a bill requiring the state's very largest employers to spend at least 8 percent of their payrolls on health benefits for their workers. Lawmakers elsewhere, including Connecticut, are considering legislation that may also require some companies to provide coverage, either directly or by paying into a state fund.

Some measures, as with a New Jersey proposal, would let companies bid on state contracts only if they provided health insurance for their workers.

 

Read More

 
     
 
The New York Times On The Web 
 
     
 
©2004 Alliance For Economic Justice
| Members | About AEJ | Contact Us | Links |